Friday, September 16, 2022

Walt Disney Comics Digest #52: Into the Archive



Yesterday (September 15th) I returned from my doctor’s appointment to find that Walt Disney Comics Digest #52 (April 1975) had arrived, and sooner than I had expected. I eagerly brought it in and started to unwrap it, only to find it packaged more securely than a miser’s penny. As I finally, carefully, removed the last layer of wrapping, I began to notice a few odd anomalies.

A slight scuff on the cover drew my attention to the fact that it bore the Whitman impress rather than the more familiar Gold Key logo, as is shown in the picture here that I snagged off the internet. Now Gold Key is simply another division of Whitman, but it made me wonder what had gone on. Flipping it open, I also found that the inside covers were blank, without any of the advertising usually found there. Otherwise, the issue was still 128 pages for 69 cents, as was normal for the run at this time.

Inside, quite a lot is taken up with the Zorro story, a ‘live action-adventure type tale’ of the sort I never particularly cared for in the comics. I didn’t find the cartoon stories all that engaging either, but that could simply be because I’m a nearly 60-year-old grouch with no sentimental memories attached to them.

Super-Goof battles a scientific villain who steals his super-goobers; Donald tries to start a fix-it shop; Chip and Dale help Gramma Duck battle a thieving Pete; and Bucky Bug and the citizens of Junkville dealing with a sudden deep snow and an invasion of ants are among the better tales. There seems to be a drop in the graphic quality overall, not terrible but a noticeable simplification of the grade.

This acquisition leaves me with only five more issues to get to complete the entire run. Most of them are in the fifties, like #52 here. I hope they are of a better quality than this moderately bland offering, or it may leave the completion of the quest with a rather bitter-sweet tang in the feelings.

The Back Cover.

Thursday, September 15, 2022

The Mystery of the Jacques Cousteau Notebook

 


I’d like talk about “The Mystery of the Jacques Cousteau Notebook”.  It remains to this day one of the most inexplicable enigmas and most regrettable actions of my life, and it shall probably never be resolved this side of Heaven.

The Jacques Cousteau Notebook dated back to my middle school years, from about the same time as the Old Green Mill “Earth Tones” notebook mentioned yesterday. It too was a spiral notebook, but a full 8x10 one. It was originally bought for schoolwork, but I eventually ended up using it for some of my earliest drawing, creative writing, and copying poetry.

What I remember most are a few of the pictures. I know there was at least one Loch Ness Monster (like the one shown yesterday), a dragon, a Bigfoot and an Abominable Snowman that John drew for me, and it wouldn’t surprise me if it had one or two of my early maps in it and some pictures of Dwarves. It also had a drawing of “The Three Loonies”.

The Three Loonies were three characters from a ‘Shakesperean-type’ play I was working on. One was fat, one was skinny, and one was old and bearded. If I let my mind go unfocussed for a moment, I can almost see the picture, with them dressed in that type of fairy-tale Medieval clothing I used to draw. Anyway, the ‘plot’ (such as it was) centered around a mysterious letter as the McGuffin that got passed around, stolen, and restored. Imagine a Laurel-and-Hardy film, if they were joined by a wise if absent-minded elderly gent. Anyway, the play never got any farther than the picture and, perhaps, a few notes.

I have no firm memory of this, but the poetry probably included some copied verses from The Dark is Rising books and may even have included one or two of my own prototypical efforts at rhyming. There might have been a guide to the Futhark runes, as well. As I say, it’s something of a blur at this distance, as even is the exact timing of when the tragedy happened.

It was of my own devising; that alone is devastatingly clear. The time had come for our annual summer camping trip. Somehow, I had conceived the idea that something might happen to my precious Notebook while I was away (What was I thinking? Stolen? Maliciously destroyed?) Anyway, I was overcome with some sort of Tom Fool romantic notion that my efforts must be hidden for safekeeping, so I went about searching for the best hiding place imaginable.

I clearly recall at least four places I considered for the stashing. The simplest was behind the towels in the bathroom closet. Rejected as too easy, and in danger of damp. Then was slipping it into the access passage to the roof or possibly down the access passage under the house, both available in the boys’ room. The last place I remember considering was between the piles of blankets in the closet of Mom and Pop’s room.

All I know now is that I hid the Notebook. And then … I did all I could do to put out of my mind where I hid it.

Why? Why? Why did I do it? The closest answer I can come up with now is that it was a kind of game, a real-life playing at a sort of adventure, a hide-and-seek, treasure-mappy thing that appealed to my youthful fancy and self-importance. Only I seemed to have played it all too well.

When we returned from out two or three days of camping, I went to retrieve the Notebook from where I seemed to remember having put it … in the blankets in Mom and Pop’s closet. It was not there, scramble through the folds how I might. I would have taken the pile apart in desperation if I could, but the closet was pretty much off limits to us kids (which I had thought in my sneaky way added to its safety) and I could not just go digging around. But it was pretty plainly not there, anyway.

I checked the other hidey places as best as I could (they were all predicated on how hard they were to reach) but came up with nothing, and Mike (the biggest kid ahead of me) wasn’t sticking his head up or down any holes for me. I was left with the wretched recognition that something bad had happened to the Notebook after all, and that it was me.

The enigma only deepened over the years as with time all the possible recesses of the house were explored. Finally, after Pop passed away, the time came to sell the house, and it was thoroughly emptied from stem to stern. Some surprising relics turned up, from ancient clippings of newspaper comics to old tracings of mine from Cinders, but nary a scrap of the vanished Notebook.  Had it been inadvertently thrown out? Eaten by mice? Disintegrated by time? I wonder still, mourning my foolish loss, and pondering, every now and then, The Mystery of the Jacques Cousteau Notebook. 

Wednesday, September 14, 2022

I Sea Monsters

Special Edition: Sea Monsters (1976)

The Seventies was truly the age of cryptozoology, of  UFO encounters, of demons and cults. With old certainties being questioned, old uncertainties began to gain more credence - or credulity. Mike, who always had an interest in the sea and ichthyology anyway (Jaws was already big at the time and the mystery and fear of the sea particularly potent) bought this very intriguing mag that was of deep interest to us all. It was full of classical illustrations from mythology and legend as well as the latest photos of globsters and suspicious-looking decayed corpses that recalled the classical forms of plesiosaurs. It was here that I was introduced to the compelling art of Theodor Kittelsen. I still have our much-wrinkled copy safe in the Archives.
Also, from the June 1977 edition of National Geographic (also in the Archives) there was this speculative recreation of the Loch Ness Monster, largely based on reported sightings and the famous 1972 "flipper" photo. This 'realistic' portrayal strongly captured my young imagination, and I drew it again and again. Here is an example from my old "Green Mill" Earth Tones 3x5 inch notebook, filled up by 1978 -1979, if my notes are correct.

The Shadow Library: Flying in From Nowhere

Peter Pan (2003)

I don't know why so many Shadows are flying in to haunt me today; perhaps it because September 14 has always been a significant date for me. Anyway, I bought my copy used from Blockbuster Video (which should tell you how long ago it was). A fluffy confection of an adaptation, using all the new technology available at the time, that in the end failed to live up to its promise.

 

The Shadow Library: Too Many Magics

 

From 1980 or so. The appeal of Master of the Five Magics by Lyndon Hardy for me at the time was that it was published by Del Rey and promised to be more about magic than swords, as far as the fantasy went. I couldn't tell you, at this distance, what happens in the book. I only remembered it just now because I saw the cover art without the words on another site, and looked it up briefly on Wikipedia. Apparently it had two sequels and is now looked upon as an early example of a "Hard Magic" system.

The Shadow Library: Desperately Seeking Will Stanton

Well, you can hardly blame them. When The Seeker (2007) was made, Harry Potter was at the height of its popularity, and everyone was eager to try to ride that wave to the cash nirvana. On the face of it, it seemed like a sure thing. An adaptation of the 1973 classic The Dark is Rising had all the familiar elements: a young eleven-year-old English boy suddenly coming into his power, having to face dark forces and live a secret life apart from the Muggle ... pardon me, mundane world. You could not even accuse it of plagiarism, because it had already established tropes that the whole genre (including Rowling) was utilizing. So what did they do? They aged up Will, made him and his family Americans, and made it 'relevant' to the youth by adding cell-phones and internet culture in the stupidest way. Instead of making it atmospheric and evocative they turned it into a cliché-ridden theme park ride. I tried to watch this travesty of one of my beloved - even foundational - childhood classics, then regretfully saw it pass into the abyss of the Shadow Library.

Tuesday, September 13, 2022

The Shadow Library: Attend the Tale

 

Many years ago I saw the version of "Sweeney Todd" with Angela Lansbury and George Hearn when it came on Showtime, where it entered my mind like a blood-soaked fever dream, only furtively recalled now and then. When this theatrical version came out (2007) and was later released as a fairly cheap DVD (with the further allurements of Alan Rickman and Tim Burton) I gave it a shot, but found that, for me, it did not have the appeal of the filmed stage show. 
And speaking of one Johnny Depp film reminds me that I used to have this one too, From Hell (2001). Adapted from Alan Moore's graphic novel, this speculative story of the search for Jack the Ripper had a load of some of the best British actors, from Ian Holm to Robbie Coltrane to Ian Richardson. I don't know, maybe the blood and languers of Grand Guignol are, in the long run, just not for me. I simply put these two movies from my mind once I dispensed with them, though I once thought them worth a look. 
"You are losing my interest," the rustling voice interrupted him again, "and that is very dangerous. In a moment I will have forgotten you quite entirely, and will never be able to remember just what I did with you. What I forget not only ceases to exist, but never really existed in the first place." – King Haggard, The Last Unicorn