Classics Illustrated:
Huckleberry Finn
As I’ve said before, my
sister is going through a bunch of her kids' old stuff and getting ready for a
garage sale. That’s at least thirty years of paraphernalia she’s been storing,
and the storage had been having a detrimental effect on the stuff itself. There
are things that have been ruined and can simply be thrown away. But she cannot
justify holding onto everything either, so, after a winnowing down to sentimental
essentials, she is planning another huge sale, something she hasn’t done for
years.
Part of this are books that
they’ve been going through; some are staying, but many are now packed up in
bins, ready to move out. The lids are still off, so I cast a curious eye into
one while I was in the house, and my attention was immediately riveted.
Right on top was a batch of
goodities that struck my immediate reaction of ‘Aw, why is this one going?’
There was Roald Dahl’s The Witches and Mary Norton’s Bed-knob
and Broomstick [especially tempting since it had different illustrations by an Anthony Lewis; a variation!] and E. B. White’s Charlotte’s Web, all in
spanking new editions that could well replace my crinkly and creaking old
copies, or at least supplement them.
After a few moments I
wrestled down my bibliophilic impulses with the thoughts of ‘did I really need
them’ and ‘they might go to some kid who really did.’ There was one slender
item that I could not resist, though, and that was the Classics Illustrated
edition of Huckleberry Finn.
Now I have several items
like this, Classics Illustrated ‘comic books’ that started their run in 1941
(as ‘Classic Comics’) and ended it in 1969. As such the artwork can sometimes be
a little primitive (especially in the run of Classics Illustrated Junior, that
featured fairy tales, myths, and legends), if fancier in some adaptations; the
series was reprinted through several mutations over the years. In 1997-1998
these digest-sized reprints came out, recolored with newly air-brushed
backgrounds. Some had new covers. This new cover is oddly disturbing. Not
totally inaccurate, but that’s an interesting, Johnny-Winter-like
interpretation of Huck. Here is the original.


No comments:
Post a Comment